News Story: Full Text
Sponsored By
Orbus Therapeutics Inc Clinical Trial for Recurrent Anaplastic Astrocytomas
Please Click On The Above Banner For More Details
Braintumor Website

Scientists give brain`s speech processor new home

Al Musella's Comments: (This is his personal views and are not necessarily the views of the Musella Foundation!)


Posted on: 02/01/2012

Scientists give brain's speech processor new home




The part of the brain used for speech processing is in a different location than originally believed, according to a U.S. study that researchers said will require a rewrite of medical texts.

Wernicke's area, named after the German neurologist who proposed it in the late 1800s, was long believed to be at the back of the brain's cerebral cortex, behind the auditory cortex, which receives sounds.

But a review by scientists at George-town University Medical Center of more than 100 imaging studies has shown it is three centimetres closer to the front of the brain, and is in front of the auditory cortex, not behind.

"Textbooks will now have to be rewritten," said neuroscience professor Josef Rauschecker, lead author of the study, which appears in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. "We gave old theories that have long hung a knockout punch."

Rauschecker and colleagues based their research on 115 previous peer-reviewed studies that investigated speech perception and used brain imaging scans - either MRI (functional magnetic resonance imaging) or PET (positron emission tomography).

An analysis of the brain imaging coordinates in those studies pointed to the new location for Wer-nicke's area, offering new insight for patients suffering from brain damage or stroke.

"If a patient can't speak, or under-stand speech, we now have a good clue as to where damage has occurred," said Rauschecker.

It also adds an intriguing wrinkle to the origins of language in humans and primates, who have also been shown to process audible speech in the same region of the brain.

"This finding suggests the architecture and processing between the two species is more similar than many people thought."

Lead author Iain DeWitt, a PhD candidate in Georgetown University's Interdisciplinary Program in Neuroscience, said the study con-firms what others have found since brain imaging began in earnest in the 1990s, though some debate has persisted.

"The majority of imagers, however, were reluctant to overturn a century of prior understanding on account of what was then a relatively new methodology," he said.

"The point of our paper is to force a reconciliation between the data and theory."


Read more:


Click HERE to return to brain tumor news headlines

Home | Brain Tumor Guide | FAQs | Find A Treatment
Noteworthy Treatments | News | Virtual Trial | Videos | Novocure Optune® | Newsletter
Donations | Brain Tumor Centers | Survivor Stories | Temodar®
Fundraising For Research | Unsubscribe | Contact Us

Copyright (c) 1993 - 2019 by:
The Musella Foundation For Brain Tumor Research & Information, Inc
1100 Peninsula Blvd
Hewlett, NY 11557